On 11/27/09 12:24 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Well, with some careful changes, I think flashrom can get by with maybe > 2 kB of RAM or CAR. I know what to change, but I can't make 100% correct > RAM requirement estimates. And we'll need boatloads of const keywords. > Patches welcome, especially for the const stuff. The biggest writable > object is the flashchip array. We can make it const, but then we have to > copy each chip to a temporary variable during probe. Not really ideal. Hm. > Why the copy?
Can't we instead have a writable struct flashchip_instance and let that contain a pointer to the current readonly struct flashchip member? Stefan _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
