On 11/27/09 12:54 AM, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > - Handling chips with varying sizes (based on some config byte) is > broken by this change. > Which chips are that?
> - Since such a change will break every other unapplied patch out there, > the only chance this has in getting in is when the patch queue size is > near zero. Won't happen anytime soon if the current review rate (more > patches sent than reviewed) is any indication. > Makes sense. > Plus, we have to convert all of printf(), printf_debug(), > fprintf(stderr,) to wrapper functions which can be compiled out or be > adapted to serialice. that should happen anyways.. > And we need a rewritten main(). Doable, but post > 0.9.2 material (unless someone sends easy-to-review patches). > I'd refrain from making main() part of this.. All the other stuff is libpayload material... so main() can be done by whoever uses libpayload then... > I don't want to discourage you, but it won't be a walk in the park. > > Ok, let's delay this until after 0.9.2 Stefan _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
