On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:41:37AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > Hi Luc, > > I almost committed this patch, then I found a line which you might > object to. We have a lspci for exactly this board from another user. > Subject: [flashrom] Asus M2V-MX information > From: Michael Spang <[email protected]> > > On 30.11.2009 10:19, David Bartley wrote: > > + {0x1106, 0x3337, 0x1043, 0x80ed, 0x1106, 0xB188, 0, 0, NULL, > > NULL, "ASUS", "M2V-MX", > > board_asus_m2v_mx}, > > > > We might want to pick a pair of device IDs which has subsystems. > > Regards, > Carl-Daniel
Strange, so the "m2v-mx" requires a board enable, while the "m2v-mx se" (which i own) doesn't? First, i have some patches here to tighten up the match table, and i intend to just go ahead and commit them after a bit of settling time. Secondly, after that, the board matching will become a lot more strict. If there is any subsystem id present, all subsystem ids will be used. If one of the four subsystem ids is not null, all nulls have to be matched by the hardware too. So the second set of subsystem ids here better be nulls for real :) Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
