On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:57:22AM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote: > On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 12:41:37AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote: > > Hi Luc, > > > > I almost committed this patch, then I found a line which you might > > object to. We have a lspci for exactly this board from another user. > > Subject: [flashrom] Asus M2V-MX information > > From: Michael Spang <[email protected]> > > > > On 30.11.2009 10:19, David Bartley wrote: > > > + {0x1106, 0x3337, 0x1043, 0x80ed, 0x1106, 0xB188, 0, 0, NULL, > > > NULL, "ASUS", "M2V-MX", > > > board_asus_m2v_mx}, > > > > > > > We might want to pick a pair of device IDs which has subsystems. > > > > Regards, > > Carl-Daniel > > Strange, so the "m2v-mx" requires a board enable, while the "m2v-mx se" > (which i own) doesn't? > > First, i have some patches here to tighten up the match table, and i > intend to just go ahead and commit them after a bit of settling time. > > Secondly, after that, the board matching will become a lot more strict. > If there is any subsystem id present, all subsystem ids will be used. > If one of the four subsystem ids is not null, all nulls have to be > matched by the hardware too. So the second set of subsystem ids here > better be nulls for real :) > > Luc Verhaegen.
aha, MX is lpc, MX SE is spi, so vastly different boards. Luc Verhaegen. _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
