On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 05:12:19AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> On 08.12.2009 11:52, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 02:16:08AM +0100, Carl-Daniel Hailfinger wrote:
> >   
> >> Refactor ITE SuperI/O detection/access.
> >> The new code reduces duplications and paves the way for generic SuperI/O
> >> detection.
> >> Additional cost: We enter/exit the SuperI/O configuration mode twice.
> >> Once for detecting which SuperI/O it is, and once for actually changing
> >> the settings.
> >> Additional benefit: This has the potential of allowing some sort of
> >> primitive laptop detection (by way of checking whether an EC or a simple
> >> SuperI/O is present).
> >>
> >> I have added a call to a not yet implemented Winbond SuperI/O detection
> >> function inside #if 0 to make extension more straighforward.
> >>
> >> This affects most SiS chipsets and IT87 SPI translation, so tests in
> >> verbose mode would be appreciated. In theory, functionality should be
> >> unchanged.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>
> >>     
> >
> > NACK :)
> >   
> 
> Heh.
> 
> > The code in the chipset enable needs to go :)
> >   
> 
> #if 0 for now and moved to board_enable.c. Can postpone/drop if you want.
> 
> 
> > Apart from that, we need this, we need general superio detection, and
> >   
> 
> Done.
> 
> 
> > the write enables moved out of board_enable.c,
> 
> Not so 100% sure about that. Newer boards may use these settings as
> GPIOs for other purposes.
> 
> 
> > plus some gpio line setting code per superio.
> >   
> 
> True. Separate patch, though.
> 
> 
> > For the IT8705, we need to work out what we want to do, there are two 
> > similar routines in board_enable.c, and this code below is the third.
> >
> > We need a single one, and for the time being, it needs to be done
> > depending on a board match.
> >   
> 
> Hmmm. I'd postpone that to a separate patch once we agree upon the
> architecture and implementation for this one.
> 
> 
> > Also, do we need the ite spi probe before we do flash detection?
> >   
> 
> Absolutely. It happens in the board enable code right now, but we can
> kill a boatload of them if we run the it86spi detection always (well,
> always in the case a matching superio is present). If we don't run IT87
> SPI probe/setup before the first flash access, flashrom will NOT know
> that SPI is supported, and flashrom will therefore skip all SPI probing.
> That would effectively disable IT87 SPI completely.
> 
> 
> > So toss out the superio from the chipset enable (patch filed), and then 
> > alter the patch here to provide us with more general superio 
> > infrastructure :)
> >
> > We need this.
> >   
> 
> Next try. I focused on the generic infrastructure aspect and will leave
> conversion of non-IT8712/IT8716 code to later patches.
> SuperI/O detection now happens unconditionally and before the chipset
> enable. We could run it after chipset enable, but it definitely has to
> happen before board enable. I don't have a preference either way.
> The board enable table should contain a struct superio for better
> matching, but I'll leave that to a separate patch once this is tested
> and committed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>
> 
> Index: flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/flash.h
> ===================================================================
> --- flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/flash.h     (Revision 807)
> +++ flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/flash.h     (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -331,6 +331,14 @@
>  
>  /* internal.c */
>  #if NEED_PCI == 1
> +struct superio {
> +     uint16_t vendor;
> +     uint16_t port;
> +     uint16_t model;
> +};
> +extern struct superio superio;
> +#define SUPERIO_VENDOR_NONE  0x0
> +#define SUPERIO_VENDOR_ITE   0x1
>  struct pci_dev *pci_dev_find_filter(struct pci_filter filter);
>  struct pci_dev *pci_dev_find_vendorclass(uint16_t vendor, uint16_t class);
>  struct pci_dev *pci_dev_find(uint16_t vendor, uint16_t device);
> @@ -340,6 +348,7 @@
>  void get_io_perms(void);
>  void release_io_perms(void);
>  #if INTERNAL_SUPPORT == 1
> +void probe_superio(void);
>  int internal_init(void);
>  int internal_shutdown(void);
>  void internal_chip_writeb(uint8_t val, chipaddr addr);
> @@ -544,6 +553,7 @@
>  extern uint16_t it8716f_flashport;
>  void enter_conf_mode_ite(uint16_t port);
>  void exit_conf_mode_ite(uint16_t port);
> +struct superio probe_superio_ite(void);
>  int it87spi_init(void);
>  int it87xx_probe_spi_flash(const char *name);
>  int it8716f_spi_send_command(unsigned int writecnt, unsigned int readcnt,
> Index: flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/it87spi.c
> ===================================================================
> --- flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/it87spi.c   (Revision 807)
> +++ flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/it87spi.c   (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -54,19 +54,56 @@
>       sio_write(port, 0x02, 0x02);
>  }
>  
> -static uint16_t find_ite_spi_flash_port(uint16_t port)
> +uint16_t probe_id_ite(uint16_t port)
>  {
> -     uint8_t tmp = 0;
> -     char *portpos = NULL;
> -     uint16_t id, flashport = 0;
> +     uint16_t id;
>  
>       enter_conf_mode_ite(port);
> -
>       id = sio_read(port, CHIP_ID_BYTE1_REG) << 8;
>       id |= sio_read(port, CHIP_ID_BYTE2_REG);
> +     exit_conf_mode_ite(port);
>  
> -     /* TODO: Handle more IT87xx if they support flash translation */
> -     if (0x8716 == id || 0x8718 == id) {
> +     return id;
> +}
> +
> +struct superio probe_superio_ite(void)
> +{
> +     struct superio ret = {};
> +     uint16_t ite_ports[] = {ITE_SUPERIO_PORT1, ITE_SUPERIO_PORT2, 0};
> +     uint16_t *i = ite_ports;
> +
> +     i++;
> +     ret.vendor = SUPERIO_VENDOR_ITE;
> +     for (; *i; i++) {
> +             ret.port = *i;
> +             ret.model = probe_id_ite(ret.port);
> +             switch (ret.model >> 8) {
> +             case 0x82:
> +             case 0x86:
> +             case 0x87:
> +                     printf_debug("Found ITE SuperI/O, id %04hx\n",
> +                                  ret.model);
> +                     return ret;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     /* No good ID found. */
> +     ret.vendor = SUPERIO_VENDOR_NONE;
> +     ret.port = 0;
> +     ret.model = 0;
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static uint16_t find_ite_spi_flash_port(uint16_t port, uint16_t id)
> +{
> +     uint8_t tmp = 0;
> +     char *portpos = NULL;
> +     uint16_t flashport = 0;
> +
> +     switch (id) {
> +     case 0x8716:
> +     case 0x8718:
> +             enter_conf_mode_ite(port);
>               /* NOLDN, reg 0x24, mask out lowest bit (suspend) */
>               tmp = sio_read(port, 0x24) & 0xFE;
>               printf("Serial flash segment 0x%08x-0x%08x %sabled\n",
> @@ -105,17 +142,21 @@
>                       sio_write(port, 0x64, (flashport >> 8));
>                       sio_write(port, 0x65, (flashport & 0xff));
>               }
> +             exit_conf_mode_ite(port);
> +             break;
> +     /* TODO: Handle more IT87xx if they support flash translation */
> +     default:
> +             printf("SuperI/O ID %04hx is not on the controller list.\n", 
> id);
>       }
> -     exit_conf_mode_ite(port);
>       return flashport;
>  }
>  
>  int it87spi_common_init(void)
>  {
> -     it8716f_flashport = find_ite_spi_flash_port(ITE_SUPERIO_PORT1);
> +     if (superio.vendor != SUPERIO_VENDOR_ITE)
> +             return 1;
>  
> -     if (!it8716f_flashport)
> -             it8716f_flashport = find_ite_spi_flash_port(ITE_SUPERIO_PORT2);
> +     it8716f_flashport = find_ite_spi_flash_port(superio.port, 
> superio.model);
>  
>       if (it8716f_flashport)
>               spi_controller = SPI_CONTROLLER_IT87XX;
> @@ -129,6 +170,8 @@
>       int ret;
>  
>       get_io_perms();
> +     /* Probe for the SuperI/O chip and fill global struct superio. */
> +     probe_superio();
>       ret = it87spi_common_init();
>       if (!ret) {
>               buses_supported = CHIP_BUSTYPE_SPI;
> Index: flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/internal.c
> ===================================================================
> --- flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/internal.c  (Revision 807)
> +++ flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/internal.c  (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -125,6 +125,17 @@
>  }
>  
>  #if INTERNAL_SUPPORT == 1
> +struct superio superio = {};
> +
> +void probe_superio(void)
> +{
> +     superio = probe_superio_ite();
> +#if 0        /* Winbond SuperI/O code is not yet available. */
> +     if (superio.vendor == SUPERIO_VENDOR_NONE)
> +             superio = probe_superio_winbond();
> +#endif
> +}
> +
>  int internal_init(void)
>  {
>       int ret = 0;
> @@ -142,6 +153,9 @@
>        */
>       coreboot_init();
>  
> +     /* Probe for the SuperI/O chip and fill global struct superio. */
> +     probe_superio();
> +
>       /* try to enable it. Failure IS an option, since not all motherboards
>        * really need this to be done, etc., etc.
>        */
> Index: flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/board_enable.c
> ===================================================================
> --- flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/board_enable.c      (Revision 807)
> +++ flashrom-superio_ite_refactor/board_enable.c      (Arbeitskopie)
> @@ -66,6 +66,35 @@
>       OUTB(tmp | (data & mask), port + 1);
>  }
>  
> +/* Not used yet. */
> +#if 0
> +static int enable_flash_decode_superio(void)
> +{
> +     int ret;
> +     uint8_t tmp;
> +
> +     switch (superio.vendor) {
> +     case SUPERIO_VENDOR_NONE:
> +             ret = -1;
> +             break;
> +     case SUPERIO_VENDOR_ITE:
> +             enter_conf_mode_ite(superio.port);
> +             /* Enable flash mapping. Works for most old ITE style SuperI/O. 
> */
> +             tmp = sio_read(superio.port, 0x24);
> +             tmp |= 0xfc;
> +             sio_write(superio.port, 0x24, tmp);
> +             exit_conf_mode_ite(superio.port);
> +             ret = 0;
> +             break;
> +     default:
> +             printf_debug("Unhandled SuperI/O type!\n");
> +             ret = -1;
> +             break;
> +     }
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  /**
>   * Winbond W83627HF: Raise GPIO24.
>   *
> 
> 
> -- 
> Developer quote of the month: 
> "We are juggling too many chainsaws and flaming arrows and tigers."
> 

This stuff needs a lot of work on top, but as a first start:

Acked-by: Luc Verhaegen <[email protected]>

Luc Verhaegen.

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to