Am Donnerstag, den 25.03.2010, 15:16 +0100 schrieb Carl-Daniel
Hailfinger:
> Hm. IMHO we have too much cosmetic changes in that table. The only thing
> that happens is reordering, but AFAICS this won't affect output in any
> way. Does ordering into different (OK/boardenable/bad) groups even make
> sense?
It seems to be supposed to help managing that table. The output is
unchanged be reordering this table. It happens that the grouping in this
table is the grouping used in the Wiki, so it helps finding the URL when
you see the entry on the Wiki page.

> Your patch changes the code to match the comments again, so I don't have
> a valid code-based reason to reject your patch. Still, I think we should
> discuss the general ordering of that table before that file will get a
> hotbed of reodering moves.
We should discuss http://patchwork.coreboot.org/patch/1044/ which does
away with this table completely.

> Acked-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <[email protected]>
I will wait with that patch, thanks for the Ack.

Regards,
  Michael Karcher


_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to