On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 18:49:55 +0100 Pete Batard <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2011.06.05 01:45, Stefan Tauner wrote: > > as you know there is also a -h version available from olimex. you dont > > happen to know the ids i guess? :) > > Say no more... ;) I think the -H version, as well as ARM-USB-OCD(-H), > which are pretty much the same thing as ARM-USB-TINY(-H), only with an > RS232 port added, should be safe to include even if these are untested > right now. ah i see the ids are published on their website.. cool. jup then please add them and just mark them as NT in the array. thanks! > Unless you object, I'll add these devices to v2 of the patch. > Names would be 'armusbtinyh', 'armusbocd' and 'armusbocdh'. personally i think arm-usb-tiny-h etc. would be easier on the eyes, but i will leave the decision to you - or the majority, in case someone else expresses his opinion. thanks a lot of your work! -- Kind regards/Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Stefan Tauner _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list [email protected] http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom
