On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 12:56:21AM +0200, Stefan Tauner wrote:
> +     0x13 (O_SPIOP):
> +             Send and receive bytes via SPI.
> +             Maximum slen is Q_WRNMAXLEN result after Q_BUSTYPE returns
                                                                          ^
                                                                      Full stop.


> +             only SPI or S_BUSTYPE == SPI is used. Same for rlen and 
> Q_RDNMAXLEN.
                ^
             Capitalize


> +static struct spi_programmer spi_programmer_serprog = {
> +     .type = SPI_CONTROLLER_SERPROG,
> +     .max_data_read = MAX_DATA_READ_UNLIMITED,
> +     .max_data_write = MAX_DATA_WRITE_UNLIMITED,
> +     .command = serprog_spi_send_command,
> +     .multicommand = default_spi_send_multicommand,
> +     .read = serprog_spi_read,
> +     .write_256 = default_spi_write_256,
> +};

Please use the "aligned" style using tabs, see e.g.

  "static const struct spi_programmer spi_programmer_linux"

in linux_spi.c.


> +     if (sp_docommand(S_CMD_Q_BUSTYPE, 0, NULL, 1, &c)) {
> +             msg_perr("Warning: NAK to query supported buses\n");

perr and "Warning" doesn't sound consistent, but can be fixed in
another patch.


> +             /* Success of any of these commands is optional. We dont need

dont -> don't


> +                the programmer to tell us it's limits, but if it doesnt, we

it's -> its
doesnt -> doesn't


> +             if (!sp_docommand(S_CMD_Q_RDNMAXLEN, 0, NULL, 3, rbuf)) {
> +                     uint32_t v;
> +                     v = ((unsigned int)(rbuf[0]) << 0);
> +                     v |= ((unsigned int)(rbuf[1]) << 8);
> +                     v |= ((unsigned int)(rbuf[2]) << 16);

Why (unsigned int) and not (uint32_t)? This is done in multiple places.


> +             /* This could be translated to single byte reads (if missing),
> +              * but now we dont support that. */

dont -> don't


> +     if (!sp_check_commandavail(S_CMD_O_DELAY)) {
> +             internal_delay(delay);
> +             msg_pdbg("Note: serprog_delay used, but the programmer doesnt 
> support delay\n");

doesnt -> doesn't


> +     for(i = 0; i < len; ) {
           ^
        missing space


Otherwise
Acked-by: Uwe Hermann <[email protected]>


Uwe.
-- 
http://hermann-uwe.de     | http://sigrok.org
http://randomprojects.org | http://unmaintained-free-software.org

_______________________________________________
flashrom mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.flashrom.org/mailman/listinfo/flashrom

Reply via email to