On Sun, 13 Mar 2022 at 15:49, Nico Huber <nic...@gmx.de> wrote: > > Also I understand Meson already got into v1.2? I thought the next version > > is based on the previous? > Yes, but I hope that doesn't mean we can't revert problems :)
I don't think adding a smiley face makes it any less insulting to the people that added, and *continue to maintain* the meson feature. > The `meson.build` made it into v1.2, that is right but turned out to > cause more trouble than was expected. OS package maintainers quickly > adopted it without any second thought. Have you pondered why that might be? OS package maintainers usually don't change the way they build packages without a good reason. > And then all their packages had > issues because the `meson.build` did some things wrong (no version in- > formation in the binary for instance, no man page in the package, CLI > options not working). Are there any issues outstanding? All this talk of "removing things" does not give me the warm-and-fuzzies for building things on top of the flashrom project. Richard _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
