Sorry, lost the ML in the reply... Hi,
On 22.01.23 21:35, Anastasia Klimchuk wrote: > How to report a bug or successful testing: there are few options. > First option is to post on the mailing list (feel free to reply on > this thread, or create a new thread). I found some time now to run the same tests that were used for flashrom-stable 1.0. The good news: the external programmers that I tested so far work. Some of the build tests fail, though (list of manibuilder tags is below). I assume much of it is because of a conflict with the default C standard used by compilers: some assume older standards and don't like C99 features if they are not enabled explicitly (however, setting the standard has again implications for system header files). The s390x failures might point to a build system issue, though. Speaking of which, manibuilder still only tests make. Nico Failing tags (anita is a NetBSD test script, djgpp a DOS cross compiler): centos:7.6-amd64-clean: 2 centos:7.2-amd64-clean: 2 centos:7.3-aarch64-clean: 2 centos:7.3-amd64-clean: 2 anita:7.1-amd64: 2 anita:7.1-i386: 2 anita:8.2-amd64: 2 anita:9.1-i386: 2 anita:9.1-amd64: 2 anita:8.2-i386: 2 fedora:32-s390x: 2 fedora:31-s390x: 2 fedora:33-s390x: 2 fedora:34-s390x: 2 fedora:29-s390x: 2 anita:9.1-sparc64: 2 djgpp:6.1.0: 2 _______________________________________________ flashrom mailing list -- flashrom@flashrom.org To unsubscribe send an email to flashrom-le...@flashrom.org
