On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Rein Couperus <rein at couperus.com> wrote:
>> I wonder how many people bother to think about why PSK250 is an
>> especially bad protocol to use on HF and what might be a better
>> choice? There are many hams who don't really understand or realize
>> just how the ionosphere mangles the signal and which types of signals
>> will perform better under different propagation conditions. Maybe
>> after learning that the pskmail sysops will change their operating
>> practices.
>
> This is agressive text, and it shows the author has no clue as to what we are
> doing with pskmail...

You are perhaps right about my comments on the specifics of PSKmail
but not about my comments on propagation in general. I have a great
deal of clue about the effects of HF propagation on various modulation
schemes.

> We have 5 years experience with this, and we would not be using PSK250 if it 
> did not work...
> When it works it is 4x faster than any other mode.

And there is the operant phrase -- "when it works". Yes, PSK250 is
going to work under some conditions, e.g. single-hop propagation near
the MUF where multipath is nonexistent. Once you start to get
multipath the doppler phase modulates the signal greatly increasing
bit error rate.

> In those cases where ?it does not work we are using THOR22 or MFSK32, 
> depending on band condx.

That is very sensible because the modes based on MFSK, e.g. Thor,
DominoEX, MFSK16/32, etc, are designed with long integration times.
They are also noncoherent so phase modulation due to doppler is no
factor.

> Actually, we use PSK250, PSK125, THOR22, THOR11, THOR8, MFSK32, MFSK16.
> We can switch modes during a session. By using RSID on the servers (using 
> fldigi-3.13)
> the mode is no issue anymore.... Still PSK250 Is used 90% of the time...

I understand. Thank you for clarifying. Next time I will do better
homework first. I was not aware that pskmail was adaptive based on
conditions. I must admit, I painted pskmail with a broad brush based
on my general experience that hams will generally come up with a
substandard way of doing things and then cling to that with a tenacity
suggesting religion.

-- 
73 de Brian, WB6RQN/J79BPL

Reply via email to