Thanks very much, Dave.
-Dave, KB3FXI
BTW, keep an eye to the upcoming QST. I think Harry and I have another
article due in the June issue.
w1hkj wrote:
Mike Haynes wrote:
So long as the Rig Cat function remains the same I see no problem with this
approach.
Absolutely. This is the initial display when there is no CAT control of any
kind. The "Enter Xcvr Freq" title would change to indicate the type of control
and name of transceiver, just as it does now. I guess a radio frequency of 0 Hz
is what you get on a landline connection (at least from the users perspective).
Dave
On May 2, 2010 6:43 AM, "w1hkj" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Would this suffice to ease the entry of a novitiate into the world of digital
communications ala fldigi?
This only required code changes in 3 places so the impact on the code base is
minimal.
Dave
_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
_______________________________________________
fldigi-alpha mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
