Stelios, Thanks for accepting the change. Sorry, did I do -c instead of -u? Oops.
Leigh. >>>>>> On Sun, 13 Feb 2011 16:36:56 -0800, "Leigh L. Klotz, Jr WA5ZNU" >>>>>> <[email protected]> said: > >> I think the frequency tag in the RX text is most useful if it lets you >> get back to interesting points however you change the frequency, and not >> just on left click. > >> Here's a patch which makes the scan up and scan down macros insert the >> frequency. It obeys the existing preference for off/on. > >> I'm using the two-row macros and have set macros for search as "<?" and >> "?>". > >> If others are using macro search I'd be interested to hear if they think >> this is a good idea. > > Thanks Leigh. > > I have applied it locally and will push the commit later tonight unless > someone argues convincingly that it is a very bad idea. > > BTW please send unified diffs :-) > >> If we go this way at some point we may want to change the preference >> description on the waterfall page, but I haven't done it here to avoid >> L10N >> problems. > > Yes, you're right, it's best not to change user-visible strings at this > stage. > > > -- > > 73, > Stelios, M0GLD. > _______________________________________________ fldigi-alpha mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/fldigi-alpha
