Re: [Flent-users] [tohojo/flent] packet loss stats (#106)

[Pete Heist]

Measurement-wise, I see similar results with netperf vs irtt in my Gbit LAN 
with BQL and 'cake besteffort lan' test, with irtt having a slightly higher 
mean and maximums, as might be expected. This is something I might be able to 
improve. I'll try playing with chrt when I have time.

On the positive side(?), with irtt, I don't see the 'latency locking' effect 
that I see with netperf, where for whatever reason, certain flows would stay 
more fixed in some position relative to the mean. Also, in these runs, the 
download throughput was somewhat less with netperf, but not with irtt.

![rrul_be_irtt](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4397233/32887936-e14f11bc-cac5-11e7-96c0-63e7a7a3db17.png)
![rrul_be_netperf](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/4397233/32887937-e16cf2d6-cac5-11e7-8ae3-ff7734bc9578.png)

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/tohojo/flent/issues/106#issuecomment-344890579
_______________________________________________
Flent-users mailing list
Flent-users@flent.org
http://flent.org/mailman/listinfo/flent-users_flent.org