flent-users <notificati...@github.com> writes:

> Hi Toke,
>> On Sep 29, 2019, at 20:44, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <notificati...@github.com> 
>> wrote:
>> Rich Brown <notificati...@github.com> writes:
>> > Sorry for the delay in responding... The higher granularity makes much
>> > better plots (see below).
>> Great!
>> > Using `-m 2048,2048` I don't see a whole lot of load on my Mac 2.5 GHz
>> > Intel Core i7 at 7mbps/768kbps. Thanks.
>> No, don't expect it would. The CPU usage thing will hit you at high
>> rates (I was testing on a gigabit link).
>> I'm not sure we can realistically pick an option that works well for
>> both slow and fast links. So we may have to add a switch; and then the
>> problem becomes what to use for defaults...
>       How about make it not a "switch" but a numeric parameter, and
>       default to the current default value by principle of least
>       surprise?

Well, by "switch" I just meant "new command line option". The obvious
form of that would be, as you say, just the ability to set the netperf
xfer size directly...

You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
Flent-users mailing list

Reply via email to