+1 , if it can be done with FlexFormatter it would be even better On 04/01/12 22:54, "Carol Frampton" <cfram...@adobe.com> wrote:
>There is a coding standard but unfortunately not everyone chose to follow >it, or only followed the parts they liked. > >http://opensource.adobe.com/wiki/display/flexsdk/Coding+Conventions > >I am in favor of a coding standard. I like uniform looking code. > >Carol > >-----Original Message----- >From: Michael Schmalle <m...@teotigraphix.com> >Reply-To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> >Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 13:48:25 -0800 >To: "flex-dev@incubator.apache.org" <flex-dev@incubator.apache.org> >Subject: Flex SDK code conventions > >>I hate this topic but it needs to be asked to the community. >> >>Since I am an initial committer I will stand by whatever the consensus >>is with the code I commit. >> >>But then the question, what are we doing about this? >> >>There is already ALOT of code in the sdk that uses different >>conventions. I think this is ridiculous because it slows down >>development switching from this format to that format (reading and >>writing). >> >>I don't have an opinion on conventions, just proposing there needs to >>be protocol with committers on this sooner than later. And this >>protocol needs to be documented on a public page visible to any one >>that has this same question creating patches. >> >>Mike >> >
