Go for it.

On 1/4/12 2:13 PM, "Michael Schmalle" <m...@teotigraphix.com> wrote:

> This is likely not an option due to lexical errors, a lot of
> formatters out there aren't perfect since they parse and re-emit code.
> 
> If there was a formatter that was written that hooked into the flex
> compiler's AST, that is another animal.
> 
> I would love to work on that. :)
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> Quoting Rogelio Castillo Aqueveque <roge...@rogeliocastillo.com>:
> 
>> maybe a pre-commit hook into svn client that run the formatter just
>> before the commit happens would work.
>> 
>> ---
>> Rogelio Castillo Aqueveque
>> roge...@rogeliocastillo.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 4/01/2012, at 6:57 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
>> 
>>> This is kind of what I was getting at.
>>> 
>>> The problem with the Flex Formatter is it's an Eclipse plugin that
>>> last time I looked. The dev might have abstracted it but I don't
>>> know.
>>> 
>>> The problem is Flash Builder is not the only ide in town.
>>> 
>>> Mike
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Quoting Douglas Arthur <dart...@vmware.com>:
>>> 
>>>> I for one vote that we suggest developers to use FlexFormatter and
>>>> publish a settings file for public consumption. I believe Adobe
>>>> uses it in-house, please someone correct me if I'm wrong? And I
>>>> even believe there's a settings file floating around from Adobe.
>>>> 
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/flexformatter/index.php?title=Prefere
>>>> nces
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> - Doug
>>>> 
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:m...@teotigraphix.com]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2012 2:48 PM
>>>> To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Subject: Flex SDK code conventions
>>>> 
>>>> I hate this topic but it needs to be asked to the community.
>>>> 
>>>> Since I am an initial committer I will stand by whatever the
>>>> consensus is with the code I commit.
>>>> 
>>>> But then the question, what are we doing about this?
>>>> 
>>>> There is already ALOT of code in the sdk that uses different
>>>> conventions. I think this is ridiculous because it slows down
>>>> development switching from this format to that format (reading and
>>>> writing).
>>>> 
>>>> I don't have an opinion on conventions, just proposing there needs
>>>> to be protocol with committers on this sooner than later. And this
>>>> protocol needs to be documented on a public page visible to any
>>>> one that has this same question creating patches.
>>>> 
>>>> Mike
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui

Reply via email to