25 jan. 2012 - 10:09, John Fletcher wrote: > 2012/1/24 Remi P <rpatr...@gmail.com> > >> Just to say that I do not agree with the idea that #49 includes something >> negative, I think just the opposite >> > > Clearly, some people initially see something negative such as a fallen > "F", and some don't. However think about all those people that are so keen > to put down Flex and suggest it is dead. Even if only 20% of them see it, > can you imagine the impact of 20% of people writing about this on the > internet? And rest assured, people that want Flex to fall will certainly > "see it" as soon as it is pointed out to them and then will have the > subject for their next blog post, too... > > John
Too much emphasis on the logo ... does kill the logo. Making Flex fail with a logo is ...... a dream (or a taboo :) ). Flex will fail if its technology cannot handle the pace. But the logo is harmless. Thinking about yesterday's hot skidding: I think the FLEX brand is about what is inside the technology. The brand is the technology (eg: what you can do with it). Logo is just something not very important from now on (just my 2 cents: the remaining contestants logos are great!) Simple: the logo is harmless, the technology isn't. Everyone should now concentrate on the technology, and there we have our mountain to tell fire to ;)
