Writing unit tests for the framework is something that could be started now. The framework code is out there.
Carol On 2/6/12 8 :02AM, "Michael A. Labriola" <labri...@digitalprimates.net> wrote: >>Well, we think of them as unit tests because, unfortunately, our units >>are very large. :-) > >Ah yes, just redefine unit and then we have unit tests. If we also >redefine poor coupling, good startup performance, and small size to mean >different things as well, then we are 100% done. > >A unit test has a meaning and I don't think redefining it is the right >approach to solving the problem, >Mike > > >Notice: This transmission is intended only for the use of the individual >or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is >privileged or confidential. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of >this transmission by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly >prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please >notify the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone and delete the >original transmission. Thank you.
