If that's (or will be) a vote, +1 for Alex's proposal! About newbies and getting up to speed, I don't think that will be even comparable to learning (Java) Spring or Hibernate, and with a good instructor/training, it's not that difficult either. I'm all for more configuration on the minus side if the plus side is performance/light(er)weight components.
Alexandre On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Piotr Kawiak <piotr.kaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I totally agree with Alex. I am working in a large company on > enterprise scale project with Flex GUI and I'd love 'new' Flex to be > backwards compatible, but this sure looks like an enormous effort. In > my company we keep using Flex 3, we didn't even switch to 4, cause it > isn't really worth the effort (IMHO). I'd trade backwards > compatibility for new, cleaner component architecture. If the 'core' > stays corrupt, then I guess I'd rather keep using Flex 3. >
