> In > my company we keep using Flex 3, we didn't even switch to 4, cause it > isn't really worth the effort (IMHO).
Oops. It was worth it. Ariel Jakobovits ajako...@adobe.com 650-350-0282 On Feb 7, 2012, at 5:23 AM, Piotr Kawiak <piotr.kaw...@gmail.com> wrote: > I totally agree with Alex. I am working in a large company on > enterprise scale project with Flex GUI and I'd love 'new' Flex to be > backwards compatible, but this sure looks like an enormous effort. In > my company we keep using Flex 3, we didn't even switch to 4, cause it > isn't really worth the effort (IMHO). I'd trade backwards > compatibility for new, cleaner component architecture. If the 'core' > stays corrupt, then I guess I'd rather keep using Flex 3.
