I propose a new thread where we aggregate a proposed list of changes to the html-template (or templates).
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 6:27 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 3/8/12 3:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Slightly off the original topic so apologies in advance. > > > > I believe a requirement of the graduation process is also to have an open > > community that can discuss (and submit) changes. I don't believe we can > > graduate right away once the code has been donated and we made a single > parity > > release. Am I misunderstanding the process here? > That's correct, but someone has to run a scrub someday down the road when > we > eventually try to graduate. And we will have to pay special attention to > these changes. > > > >> It isn't an issue of quality, it is about legality. Changes here will > have > >> to be reviewed for legality, not just technical merit. > > Sorry you've totally lost me there. What legal impediments would a > (fairly > > simple) change to a single HTML file cause applied after it had been > legally > > "cleaned" and donated by Adobe? Especially if it's done by a committer > who has > > signed a CLA? > Here's an example: Suppose we have to remove playerproductinstall from the > template for legal reasons and some patch which was made against a version > that had it accidentally adds it back in. > > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
