On 10/03/2012 04:47, Greg Reddin wrote:
Do we know that or has that discussion occurred?
There has been lengthy (public) discussions about Maven on Flex and
maven in Flex. I guess if the developers wanted to they would offer it
here?!
Am I in the wrong impression here?
On 10/03/2012 04:56, James Cowan wrote:
The license is GPL on the flexmojos site.
?? It states big and in all class files that its APL[1] where do you
read GPL?
I have always found Marvin extremely helpful. Also the source code of
flexmojos is enormous (enough to make your eyes water) and it took me
a day and
some ghastly hacks to get it to coexist imperfectly with SDK 4.6 so
getting Marvin involved somehow would be very good.
Apache is all about self-interest. If Marvin wants to help he can do so.
On 10/03/2012 05:04, Skogen, Espen wrote:
Sure, but Flexmojos does a perfectly fine job at building Flex in a Maven
environment. I suppose if Marvin decided to abandon it, then there would be an
argument for bringing it into the fold, but I don't see a reason to reinvent
the wheel. Just use Flexmojos if you want to use Maven - That's certainly what
I'm doing:)
I am not sure why to call it abandoned? The last commit was 8 days
ago[2] That is okay for a small project.
yours
Martin.
[1] http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/license.html
[2] https://github.com/Flexmojos/flexmojos/commits/flexmojos-4.x
