> > yours > Martin. > > (Just wondering: Graduating isn't urgent?! okay...) >
I think its urgent, there's just other things with high priorities that need to get done before the decision to change packages for a future release (one that is done after we do our initial release that should be as identical to Adobe Flex 4.6). We still need to get JIRA issues imported and learn to do a release under the Apache model. So I believe there's time to have a discussion about a 5.0 (next big release). Getting JIRA imported, getting the compiler code imported, and getting the rest of the Adobe donations in (Mustella) is still going to take a bit so we have time to figure this issue out. I think the first thing that needs to get cleared up is if having "org.apache.projectName..." as the start of your class package names is actually a requirement of Apache projects or not. If it is not a requirement of Apache projects and there aren't any good arguments for adding "org.apache.flex." to the beginning of all packages then I don't think that another vote on this would be needed as its pretty clear the PPMC and a lot of the community is against it. But if it is a requirement for Apache projects then that's a completely different story. -- Omar Gonzalez s9tpep...@apache.org
