Hi, it sounds really weird for me that community (non-payed effort) will be spending time packaging the sdk to work with the "old school" implementation of a payed effort (aka Adobe Flash Builder). Adobe will put their own effort to work with the new SDK, the same as Intellij, FDT, and other IDEs out there. This is, for me, the world upside down...
Adobe *MUST* change Fb to be Apache Flex SDK compliant and not the inverse! Did you see something like this before in other open source projects? 2012/6/12 Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > Hi, > > > If they make Flash Builder free, that will be awesome. But i know they > won't make it at-least for 2 years. In other case, they should give some of > the testing tools free. like Profiler. > I don't know what Adobe is planning in regards to Flash Builder but I'd > guess it will be out in 6 months. > > Given the last 4.5 -> 4.6 upgrade was free and I can't see too many new > features in 4.7 I'd expect the upgrade to be low cost or free. But I could > be way off on both accounts. > > Flash Builder is no longer a part of creative suite which I think is > unfortunate. > > Adobe have spoken about Monocle a new way of profiling Flash (and I assume > Flex) applications so perhaps we'll see that in the next version of Flash > Builder? > > Thanks, > Justin > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 35 57 77 <http://www.codeoscopic.com> CODEOSCOPIC S.A. <http://www.codeoscopic.com> Avd. del General Perón, 32 Planta 10, Puertas P-Q 28020 Madrid
