No,
I only have
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>playerglobal</artifactId>
<version>10-3.2.0.3958.cdm</version>
<type>swc</type>
</dependency>
<dependency>
<groupId>com.adobe.flex.framework</groupId>
<artifactId>flex-framework</artifactId>
<version>3.2.0.3958.cdm</version>
<type>pom</type>
</dependency>
I'll add the compiler dependency and see...
On 12 Jan., 16:35, "Marvin Froeder" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Did you update compiler version on plugin dependency?
> Like
> this:http://svn.sonatype.org/flexmojos/trunk/test-harness/projects/concept...
>
> VELO
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, ddinger <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
>
> > I'm currently compiling my swf project against a flex builder 3.2 skd
> > that I installed using the flex-installer mojo.
> > The swf I'm working on uses flex charting components and therefore
> > needs a professional sdk to run without the watermark.
> > I added the corresponding license information in the parent pom of my
> > project and I see that the commandline of the flex compiler mojo uses
> > the license information when compiling. on my local machine everything
> > works fine but today I realized that the swf - when compiled on our
> > continuous integration server - shows the watermark even though the
> > compiler settings show the license key.
>
> > Is there something else I need to do, to tell the compiler mojo that
> > it uses a professional sdk ?
>
> > Regards,
> > Dirk
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
