On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM, ddinger <[email protected]> wrote: > And where is that "known" location, if I may ask ? http://blog.ryanswanson.com/2008/05/flex-builder-license-reset.html
> Is the watermark related to the pure existance of the license.jar (it > seems to be included in every sdk version) of the correctness of the > license string ? would I see any error message if I had a typo in the > key ? No, the correct license.jar for your FDK version needs to be on the compilers classpath, it uses license.jar to validate the license key. If you have a typo in the key, or if the license.jar is not on the runtime classpath of the compiler, it won't validate the key, but it silently falls back to "demo" mode with the watermark. It would be nice if it displayed a warning, but alas they (FDK) do not. > In this "known" location my license number is stored without the "-"s. > Maybe that's the difference ? No, the dashes make no difference, the key name does need to be flexbuilder3 The most common causes of the watermark that I know of are typo in the key or wrong key name, or wrong or missing license.jar on the compiler classpath. Logan --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
