Oh, I guess that was the feature Logan mentioned in another thread. So, in my "real" project the charts are all in a library. Does this auto-license feature only work for SWFs, not SWCs?
But more importantly, I won't have FB on the build machine, so I really need to figure this out. Does my <build> look OK? Should I have the <licenses> tag in the SWC pom or the SWF pom or both? Thanks On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > I love to do things automatically on flex-mojos. > > If you run it on a machine that does have flexbuilder installed, it will > take the license from it, automatically. > > > VELO > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I am so confused by this license stuff. Any further troubleshooting tips? >> >> I have an FB SDK installed. I have a <licenses> tag as below. I've tried >> with and without dashes, but still get the watermark. >> Then I tried the same thing in a HelloWorld project just containing an >> <mx:LineChart> with no series data. No watermark. I removed the <licenses> >> tag. Still no watermark, but the command line output still shows the >> license number on the compiler options, even though I removed the tag! >> >> <build> >> <plugins> >> <plugin> >> <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId> >> <artifactId>flex-compiler-mojo</artifactId> >> <dependencies> >> <dependency> >> <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> >> <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> >> <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> >> <type>pom</type> >> </dependency> >> </dependencies> >> <extensions>true</extensions> >> <configuration> >> <licenses> >> <flexbuilder3>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX</flexbuilder3> >> </licenses> >> </configuration> >> </plugin> >> </plugins> >> </build> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Thanks. Sorry I missed it. >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Wow.... >>>> >>>> There it is. >>>> >>>> http://docs.flex-mojos.info/flex-compiler-mojo/compile-swf-mojo.html#licenses >>>> >>>> >>>> VELO >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Richard Rodseth >>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thanks to Velo's 2.0.3 release, I can now build my projects, but still >>>>> need to tackle the Data Visualization license issue. >>>>> >>>>> I saw the recent thread about pro sdk license issues, with references >>>>> to a "license tag". Is this documented somewhere? Where does it go? I >>>>> didn't >>>>> see an example in subversion either and couldn't find my answer at >>>>> http://docs.flex-mojos.info/ >>>>> >>>>> Thanks. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
