So I think you need in both! VELO
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]> wrote: > Oh, I guess that was the feature Logan mentioned in another thread. > > So, in my "real" project the charts are all in a library. Does this > auto-license feature only work for SWFs, not SWCs? > > But more importantly, I won't have FB on the build machine, so I really > need to figure this out. Does my <build> look OK? Should I have the > <licenses> tag in the SWC pom or the SWF pom or both? > > Thanks > > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: > >> I love to do things automatically on flex-mojos. >> >> If you run it on a machine that does have flexbuilder installed, it will >> take the license from it, automatically. >> >> >> VELO >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> I am so confused by this license stuff. Any further troubleshooting tips? >>> >>> I have an FB SDK installed. I have a <licenses> tag as below. I've tried >>> with and without dashes, but still get the watermark. >>> Then I tried the same thing in a HelloWorld project just containing an >>> <mx:LineChart> with no series data. No watermark. I removed the <licenses> >>> tag. Still no watermark, but the command line output still shows the >>> license number on the compiler options, even though I removed the tag! >>> >>> <build> >>> <plugins> >>> <plugin> >>> <groupId>info.flex-mojos</groupId> >>> <artifactId>flex-compiler-mojo</artifactId> >>> <dependencies> >>> <dependency> >>> <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> >>> <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> >>> <version>3.1.0-fb3</version> >>> <type>pom</type> >>> </dependency> >>> </dependencies> >>> <extensions>true</extensions> >>> <configuration> >>> <licenses> >>> <flexbuilder3>XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX</flexbuilder3> >>> </licenses> >>> </configuration> >>> </plugin> >>> </plugins> >>> </build> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 8:43 PM, Richard Rodseth <[email protected]>wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks. Sorry I missed it. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Wow.... >>>>> >>>>> There it is. >>>>> >>>>> http://docs.flex-mojos.info/flex-compiler-mojo/compile-swf-mojo.html#licenses >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> VELO >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 10:56 PM, Richard Rodseth >>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Thanks to Velo's 2.0.3 release, I can now build my projects, but still >>>>>> need to tackle the Data Visualization license issue. >>>>>> >>>>>> I saw the recent thread about pro sdk license issues, with references >>>>>> to a "license tag". Is this documented somewhere? Where does it go? I >>>>>> didn't >>>>>> see an example in subversion either and couldn't find my answer at >>>>>> http://docs.flex-mojos.info/ >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
