I'm fine with using moduleFiles or any other parameter to cover the use case that modules do not load any signed RSLs. I'd say that this is even the default use case for modules. So I'd suggest to change the default behavior for Flex 4 modules to scope the Flex SDK libs as external. Additionally, to cover the case where modules load RSL, add an other parameter within moduleFiles.
Why not also use moduleFiles for projects that have only a module and no application? This is then a marker to externalize the SDK libs. What do you think? Marc On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, there is no solution for this on flexmojos side.... > I mean, may make sense in some scenario to have the RSL on the module.... > let's say something only used on the module so you wish to only be loaded on > modules.... > > Flexmojos can handle that when modulesFiles is used.... if app has RSLs, > the modules doesn't need to have it too. > > > VELO > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
