I fully agree that loading swz in modules makes sense in some cases. I estimate though that this happens by far not as often as you want to have all required swz loaded in the application. I read in your reasoning that you estimate this differently, ok. In any case, downloading the swz should happen extremely seldom.
I have a project with more than 20 modules. Putting all those into the application project is not feasible. So I have to list all SDK dependencies as in the post above in the pom. This is not very elegant. So I suggest an additional parameter that externalizes all swz upon request (and might be independent of whether it is a module or application). What do you think? Marc On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:43 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > That is my point, may make sense a module with a RSL..... > Imagine I have my app, it loads framework.swz... but no charts, no rpc.... > > The, I have a module somewhere that needs charts.... then this module load > the datavisualization.swz. I see as a complete viable scenario.... you > don't wanna you main app loading everything, just let's modules load > whatever they need to run. > > So I can't assume RSLs on modules means external. You will need to set > your scopes to external. But, when the app and the modules are built > together I do know that the app already loaded the RSL, so I can set the RSL > on modules as external. > > > VELO > > > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Marc Speck <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm fine with using moduleFiles or any other parameter to cover the use >> case that modules do not load any signed RSLs. I'd say that this is even the >> default use case for modules. So I'd suggest to change the default behavior >> for Flex 4 modules to scope the Flex SDK libs as external. Additionally, to >> cover the case where modules load RSL, add an other parameter within >> moduleFiles. >> >> Why not also use moduleFiles for projects that have only a module and no >> application? This is then a marker to externalize the SDK libs. >> >> What do you think? >> Marc >> >> >> >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>wrote: >> >>> Well, there is no solution for this on flexmojos side.... >>> I mean, may make sense in some scenario to have the RSL on the module.... >>> let's say something only used on the module so you wish to only be loaded on >>> modules.... >>> >>> Flexmojos can handle that when modulesFiles is used.... if app has RSLs, >>> the modules doesn't need to have it too. >>> >>> >>> VELO >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/ -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
