@velo - I get the following build error: [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [ERROR] BUILD ERROR [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ [INFO] The packaging for this project did not assign a file to the build artifact [INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Looking at the debug information for the deploy plugin, the artifact property is set to the production artifact name even on the QA build run. Additionally, on the QA build run, the artifact with the classifier is listed as an attachment. If I use the test-swf goal, could I provide my riatest.swc as a runtime dependency and have it baked into the generated SWF? -Brian On Dec 24, 7:37 am, velo <[email protected]> wrote: > What do you mean by "Deploy complains that I don't have an artifact to > deploy, only an attachment." ? > > VELO > > On Dec 23, 7:38 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Afternoon, > > > I have a need to build an application SWF twice in a project. Once > > for production and once for QA with the automation SWCs and RIATest > > SWCs baked into the QA version. Minus the difference in dependencies > > and the use of a classifier, the config for the plugin for each SWF is > > exactly the same. I've tried using the classifier flag on the compile- > > swf goal along with a profile to include the RIATest and automation > > SWCs as dependencies, activated by a property. Everything in the > > lifecycle occurs as expected, until I get to deploy. Deploy complains > > that I don't have an artifact to deploy, only an attachment. Using > > the debug flag and reading the docs on "classifier", I can tell that > > the main artifact for the project is not created when using this > > option. Is there an easy way to trick deploy to only deploy an > > attachment? Is there another way that anyone can suggest to > > dynamically include dependencies so I can build the production and QA > > SWF in two different executions of compile-swf on the same build run? > > Can I use the pluginArtifacts config option to do this? > > > Snippets of my POM are shown below (including the profile): > > > ... > > <plugin> > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> > > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > <version>3.5.0</version> > > <extensions>true</extensions> > > <configuration> > > <optimize>false</optimize> > > <sourceFile>Main.mxml</sourceFile> > > <allowHeadlessMode>false</allowHeadlessMode> > > <headlessServer>true</headlessServer> > > <includeTestFiles> > > <param>*Test.as</param> > > <param>*Test.mxml</param> > > </includeTestFiles> > > <excludeTestFiles> > > <param>**/integration/*</param> > > <param>**/functional/*</param> > > </excludeTestFiles> > > <licenses> > > <flexbuilder3></flexbuilder3> > > </licenses> > > <resourceBundlePath> > > ${basedir}/src/main/locales/{locale} > > </resourceBundlePath> > > <targetPlayer>10.0.0</targetPlayer> > > <verboseStacktraces>true</verboseStacktraces> > > </configuration> > > <dependencies> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> > > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <type>pom</type> > > </dependency> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> > > <artifactId>license</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > </dependency> > > </dependencies> > > </plugin> > > > ... > > <profile> > > <id>dit-specific-build</id> > > <activation> > > <activeByDefault>false</activeByDefault> > > <property> > > <name>qa</name> > > </property> > > </activation> > > <build> > > <plugins> > > <plugin> > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> > > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > <configuration> > > <classifier>riatest</classifier> > > </configuration> > > </plugin> > > </plugins> > > </build> > > <dependencies> > > <!-- Use the latest version of RIATest --> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.riatest</groupId> > > <artifactId>testagent</artifactId> > > <version>[4.3311,)</version> > > <type>swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > <!-- Flex Automation SWCs --> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > <artifactId>automation</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <type>swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > <artifactId>automation_dmv</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <type>swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > <artifactId>automation_agent</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <type>swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > <artifactId>automation_spark</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <type>swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > <artifactId>automation</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <classifier>en_US</classifier> > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > <dependency> > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > <artifactId>automation_agent</artifactId> > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > <classifier>en_US</classifier> > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > <scope>internal</scope> > > </dependency> > > </dependencies> > > </profile> > > > Is there anything in the new test-swf goal that would help me out? If > > I made the RIATest SWC a dependency in the runtime scope. would it > > build it into my SWF for me? Any help is appreciated. > > > -Brian > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
