Could you file a ticket for that? I won't be able to look into this any time soon.
VELO On Dec 28, 12:53 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > @velo - Thanks for the help. I was able to add an execution to the > build using the test-swf goal and I was able to build a QA testable > swf as I wanted. I ended up having to put the riatest and the > automation swcs in the test scope as dependencies to get it working > (per your email). I think the documentation on the Maven site needs > to be updated though: > > http://sites.sonatype.org/flexmojos/flexmojos-maven-plugin/test-swf-m... > > It says: > > Requires dependency resolution of artifacts in scope: runtime. > > but I think it should be: > > Requires dependency resolution of artifacts in scope: test. > > Thanks again for the help. > > -Brian > > On Dec 24, 1:08 pm, velo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Well, I guess if you use test scope to this libraries + test-swf goal > > you would achieve what you wanna much easier. > > > VELO > > > On Dec 24, 3:06 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > @velo - I get the following build error: > > > > [INFO] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > [ERROR] BUILD ERROR > > > [INFO] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > [INFO] The packaging for this project did not assign a file to the > > > build artifact > > > [INFO] > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > Looking at the debug information for the deploy plugin, the artifact > > > property is set to the production artifact name even on the QA build > > > run. Additionally, on the QA build run, the artifact with the > > > classifier is listed as an attachment. If I use the test-swf goal, > > > could I provide my riatest.swc as a runtime dependency and have it > > > baked into the generated SWF? > > > > -Brian > > > > On Dec 24, 7:37 am, velo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > What do you mean by "Deploy complains that I don't have an artifact to > > > > deploy, only an attachment." ? > > > > > VELO > > > > > On Dec 23, 7:38 pm, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Afternoon, > > > > > > I have a need to build an application SWF twice in a project. Once > > > > > for production and once for QA with the automation SWCs and RIATest > > > > > SWCs baked into the QA version. Minus the difference in dependencies > > > > > and the use of a classifier, the config for the plugin for each SWF is > > > > > exactly the same. I've tried using the classifier flag on the > > > > > compile- > > > > > swf goal along with a profile to include the RIATest and automation > > > > > SWCs as dependencies, activated by a property. Everything in the > > > > > lifecycle occurs as expected, until I get to deploy. Deploy complains > > > > > that I don't have an artifact to deploy, only an attachment. Using > > > > > the debug flag and reading the docs on "classifier", I can tell that > > > > > the main artifact for the project is not created when using this > > > > > option. Is there an easy way to trick deploy to only deploy an > > > > > attachment? Is there another way that anyone can suggest to > > > > > dynamically include dependencies so I can build the production and QA > > > > > SWF in two different executions of compile-swf on the same build run? > > > > > Can I use the pluginArtifacts config option to do this? > > > > > > Snippets of my POM are shown below (including the profile): > > > > > > ... > > > > > <plugin> > > > > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > > > > <version>3.5.0</version> > > > > > <extensions>true</extensions> > > > > > <configuration> > > > > > <optimize>false</optimize> > > > > > <sourceFile>Main.mxml</sourceFile> > > > > > <allowHeadlessMode>false</allowHeadlessMode> > > > > > <headlessServer>true</headlessServer> > > > > > <includeTestFiles> > > > > > <param>*Test.as</param> > > > > > <param>*Test.mxml</param> > > > > > </includeTestFiles> > > > > > <excludeTestFiles> > > > > > <param>**/integration/*</param> > > > > > <param>**/functional/*</param> > > > > > </excludeTestFiles> > > > > > <licenses> > > > > > <flexbuilder3></flexbuilder3> > > > > > </licenses> > > > > > <resourceBundlePath> > > > > > ${basedir}/src/main/locales/{locale} > > > > > </resourceBundlePath> > > > > > <targetPlayer>10.0.0</targetPlayer> > > > > > <verboseStacktraces>true</verboseStacktraces> > > > > > </configuration> > > > > > <dependencies> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>compiler</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <type>pom</type> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>license</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > </dependencies> > > > > > </plugin> > > > > > > ... > > > > > <profile> > > > > > <id>dit-specific-build</id> > > > > > <activation> > > > > > <activeByDefault>false</activeByDefault> > > > > > <property> > > > > > <name>qa</name> > > > > > </property> > > > > > </activation> > > > > > <build> > > > > > <plugins> > > > > > <plugin> > > > > > <groupId>org.sonatype.flexmojos</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>flexmojos-maven-plugin</artifactId> > > > > > <configuration> > > > > > <classifier>riatest</classifier> > > > > > </configuration> > > > > > </plugin> > > > > > </plugins> > > > > > </build> > > > > > <dependencies> > > > > > <!-- Use the latest version of RIATest --> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.riatest</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>testagent</artifactId> > > > > > <version>[4.3311,)</version> > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <!-- Flex Automation SWCs --> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>automation</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>automation_dmv</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>automation_agent</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>automation_spark</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <type>swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>automation</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <classifier>en_US</classifier> > > > > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > <dependency> > > > > > <groupId>com.adobe.flex.sdk</groupId> > > > > > <artifactId>automation_agent</artifactId> > > > > > <version>${flex.sdk.version}</version> > > > > > <classifier>en_US</classifier> > > > > > <type>rb.swc</type> > > > > > <scope>internal</scope> > > > > > </dependency> > > > > > </dependencies> > > > > > </profile> > > > > > > Is there anything in the new test-swf goal that would help me out? If > > > > > I made the RIATest SWC a dependency in the runtime scope. would it > > > > > build it into my SWF for me? Any help is appreciated. > > > > > > -Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
