hi guys,

i got some time to do this. unfortunately i did it a bit different
than velo suggested: no common codebase but rewrite from scratch, as i
prefer a more defensive and decoupled approach (maybe a bit of an over
design...). anyway, i also wrote quite a lot unit tests (unit as the
component itself and not the class) for the flashmojos plugin i've
written, but i am not sure if i have missed anything. so my current
question is:
does anyone know of a xsd or anything similar to know any possible
nodes/attributes for the .actionScriptProperties file?!
i think i will be able to submit a patch to [https://
issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-188] within the next two weeks.

kr,
christoph


On Dec 8, 9:23 am, Hannu Leinonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are some minor changes on the .actionScriptProperties and the
> builder/nature names. At least those were for beta 1, I haven't yet
> checked the beta 2 out, but I'd guess they haven't changed it a lot.
>
> -Hannu
>
> velo wrote:
> > What did changed between Flexbuilder 3 and Flashbuilder 4?
>
> > VELO
>
> > On Dec 7, 8:24 pm, Hannu Leinonen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> I'm thinking about starting to work on it again. I got it somewhat
> >> working already but then there were too many conflicting changes in the
> >> end that I gave it up.
>
> >> -Hannu
>
> >> Marvin Froeder wrote:
> >>> Hi Hannu,
> >>> Did you gave it any extra thought?
> >>> I opened a ticket for that
> >>>https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-188
> >>> <https://issues.sonatype.org/browse/FLEXMOJOS-188>If you decide to
> >>> provide a patch, please attach there.
> >>> VELO
> >>> On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:29 AM, Hannu Leinonen <[email protected]
> >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>     I'll take a look at it some day soon. Maybe I'll even send you a
> >>>     patch. ;)
> >>>     By the way. I had some compilation problems with Maven 2.1.0 with the
> >>>     maven-resources-plugin version 2.3, but it compiled nicely when I 
> >>> forced
> >>>     it to 2.2. Anybody else had this issue?
> >>>     Best Regards,
> >>>     Hannu
> >>>     Marvin Froeder wrote:
> >>>      > Depends, are you offering a patch? =D
> >>>      > Flash builder support is good.... but did nothing related to it
> >>>     so far.
> >>>      > Anyway, yes, there is a room for creating FlashbuilderMojo.....
> >>>      Is just
> >>>      > a matter of redesigning FlexbuilderMojo to has some methods to be
> >>>      > overwritten by FlashbuilderMojo, then both will have a common
> >>>     base code.
> >>>      > VELO
> >>>      > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 9:15 AM, Hannu Leinonen
> >>>     <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>      > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
> >>>      >     Hello!
> >>>      >     I've done locally some modifications to Flex-Mojos to be able
> >>>     to setup
> >>>      >     Flash Builder 4 (the successor of Flex Builder now in beta)
> >>>     projects
> >>>      >     using flexmojos:flexbuilder. There are changes in the builder
> >>>     names on
> >>>      >     .project file and some other changes on
> >>>     .actionScriptProperties that I
> >>>      >     don't think are backwards compatible.
> >>>      >     Will Flex-Mojos support Flash Builder 4?
> >>>      >     Probably the FlexBuilderMojo should be somehow split to allow
> >>>     separation
> >>>      >     of the different versions and their properties. Currently
> >>>     I've just
> >>>      >     modified it so that can build somehow valid Flex libraries
> >>>     and Flex
> >>>      >     (both web and AIR) projects. But the changes I made makes it
> >>>     unusable in
> >>>      >     Flex Builder 3 projects (I assume, didn't test though).
> >>>      >     Best Regards,
> >>>      >     Hannu
> >>> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
> >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> >>> Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> >>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> For more options, visit this group at
> >>>http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en
> >>>http://blog.flex-mojos.info/
> >>> -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos?hl=en?hl=en

http://blog.flex-mojos.info/

Reply via email to