@Velo - I'm referring more to the idea that if Adobe is getting
organized with respect to how they are distributing SWZ files, it may
be feasible that they could do the same with SWC, SWF, and JAR files
related to the SDK. If they maintained a consistent URL pattern for
distribution, that means SDK artifacts for use in any part of the
build lifecycle could be made easily referenced for download using
tools such as Ivy's URLResolver. If these artifacts could be
referenced by build tools such as Ivy and Maven, then it may be
possible to reduce the overhead you had when it came to deploying new
releases of the SDK. My understanding is that Maven's dependency
management can't work solely with a URL pattern and single artifact
file unless it conforms to {repo url}/{groupId}/{artifactId}/{version}/
{artifactId}-{version}-{classifier}.{type} and has the appropriate
checksums available for download as well. Is this true? Could Maven
download an artifact from using a URL pattern such as
http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/{type}/{groupId}/{version}/{artifactId}.{version}.{type}?
Will Maven 3 be more extensible in terms of strategies for managing
dependency resolution like the current implementation of Apache Ivy?
Just throwing the idea out there as a stop gap between Adobe's current
way of distributing the SDK versus the work you have to do. If there
is any merit in the idea, then we could solicit Adobe for help since
FlexMojos has such a large following. Again, just brainstorming.
-Brian
On Mar 31, 11:20 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> Stilll, that is not necessary at compile time. Why do you need it?
>
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:17 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > @Velo - My question was off topic and not specifically related to a
> > solution for this thread, hence the OT.
>
> > -Brian
>
> > On Mar 31, 11:15 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > I don't see your point here.... the SWZ isn't necessary to build a
> > project,
> > > using framework CACHING or not.
>
> > > VELO
>
> > > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:09 PM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > OT - Does anyone know if Maven 3 will support other types of
> > > > dependency resolution besides working with artifact repositories? For
> > > > example, Apache Ivy has a URLResolver which will adapter a URL pattern
> > > > to find an artifact and download it (i.e. -
>
> >http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/{project}/{version}/{artifactId}.{version}.{extension}<http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/%7Bproject%7D/%7Bversion%7D/%7Bar...>
> > <http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/%7Bproject%7D/%7Bversion%7D/%7Bar...>
> > > > ).
> > > > If Adobe is willing to deploy SWZ files with a dedicated pattern,
> > > > maybe we can convince them to deploy SDK artifacts and alleviate the
> > > > burden on Velo to push new SDKs out to Sonatype?
>
> > > > -Brian
>
> > > > On Mar 31, 8:33 am, Logan Allred <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > Ow dear.... is there any location people can refer to figure this
> > out?
>
> >http://help.adobe.com/en_US/Flex/4.0/UsingSDK/WS2db454920e96a9e51e63e...
>
> > > > > RSLs are linked by default in Flex 4. You shouldn't need to specify
> > > > > anything to the compiler to get RSLs to work properly. So the only
> > > > > configuration we should need to provide is if we don't want RSLs, we
> > > > > need to customize the RSLs loading order, or we don't want them all.
>
> > > > > Logan
>
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > > > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > <flex-mojos%[email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
>
> > > > For more options, visit this group at
> > > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
> > > > To unsubscribe, reply using "remove me" as the subject.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]>
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
>
> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Flex Mojos" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos
http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
