I being to think we should abstract this communication framework we have from flexmojos/flexunit into some common ground.....
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Brian <[email protected]> wrote: > @Velo - One other note, I read an article on Adobe Dev Center that > suggested sending the amf message length in the first byte of the > message since AMF isn't framed and doesn't have a content-length by > default. Doing so would reduce the lag in the > TestResultWorker#canProcess rather than making a call to > AMF3Marshaler#unmarshal which is probably more expensive. I haven't > implemented this yet in the client, but probably will be once 4.1 is > out the door. > > -Brian > > On Aug 11, 8:53 am, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Did anyone ever got an AMF server running on a java socket only? W/o the > > whole servlet server thing? > > > > I wanna change flexmojos test runner to use AMF instead of the current > > socket+xml. > > > > VELO > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<flex-mojos%[email protected]> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
