FM4 was still in beta. Most enterprise developers *do not touch* anything with a beta tag because it is extremely risky and can break the build. Even recent projects I've been on (where I had no say about which version of FM we were using) was using 3.8 (I think?) because it did everything we wanted it to do.
Trust me, those same people would want that same goal in FM4, but they haven't updated because it still had that beta moniker to it. Even a release candidate is considered risky for any large enterprise RIA. I don't understand why you would remove a functionality altogether unless there was a very good reason. I can understand if you don't support it, but remove it? At least leave it in the code for people to update it through github if need be. Isn't that the whole point of open source? On Aug 7, 7:54 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:51 PM, J_A_X <[email protected]> wrote: > > Wait, what?!? nobody cares about it? > > Doesn't feel like that, FM4 is out there for an entire year and nobody seems > to care about flashbuilder goal.... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
