Hi Christofer, Thing is, I don't have a choice as to which developers use what, and most use FB. I'm curious though, how do you use IntelliJ with FlexMojos? I'm fairly sure that IntelliJ can run maven and such, but how does it work with incremental builds since FM doesn't seem to be very good with that.
On Aug 8, 4:02 am, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> wrote: > Just to add my 50ct: > In my experience FB really really sucks as soon as you are dealing > with a lot of different Maven modules. We mooved away from FB after > constantly wasting time while waiting for FB to be usable again. We > are currently using IntelliJ for more than 2 Years and everytime I > have to put my hands on the FB I feel like mooving out of my nice, > warm flat, back into a Cave ;-) > > With IntelliJ you don't need any big plugins. It seems to work nicely without. > > Chris > > 2011/8/8 J_A_X <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > Is there any way for you to do a quick port? I would be more than > > happy to spend some time getting this to work with FM4. > > > On Aug 7, 9:28 pm, Marvin Froeder <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 10:14 PM, J_A_X <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > FM4 was still in beta. Most enterprise developers *do not touch* > >> > anything with a beta tag because it is extremely risky and can break > >> > the build. Even recent projects I've been on (where I had no say > >> > about which version of FM we were using) was using 3.8 (I think?) > >> > because it did everything we wanted it to do. > > >> > Trust me, those same people would want that same goal in FM4, but they > >> > haven't updated because it still had that beta moniker to it. Even a > >> > release candidate is considered risky for any large enterprise RIA. > > >> I should had released the pre-alpha as 4.0... FM3 I don't even run the > >> tests for years now... but whatever.... I shall probably adopt some > >> ubuntu > >> like versioning.... 1108... year+month, not sure about that... > > >> I don't understand why you would remove a functionality altogether > > >> > unless there was a very good reason. I can understand if you don't > >> > support it, but remove it? At least leave it in the code for people > >> > to update it through github if need be. > > >> Complete new codebase. FM is all about new code. But I don't really wanna > >> keep a piece of code that I don't know what it does and there is nobody > >> maintain it, it is just more stuff to people complain that do not work and > >> that bothers me. > > >> > Isn't that the whole point of open source? > > >> Sure, sure, there are tons of contributions on flexmojos.... not sure if > >> 10 > >> lines of code got changed on last 6 months... > >> Well, here it is flashbuilder goal to prove community commitment. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
