@velo: not yet... but I will try if I have no other workaround @chris: yes of course swz files are part of the official adobe sdk, but what I said is that these swz artefacts are not deployed on the sonatype repository.
regards Remi On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]>wrote: > Why do you claim, that 4.6.0.23201B doesn't contain any SWZs? If I > have a look at the FDK they are all there. > We will be having serious trouble with the Apache FDKs as these will > no longer contain SWZ files but all official Apache FDKs should > contain them. > > Chris > > > > 2012/9/19 Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>: > > Did you tried installind it manually? > > > > On Sep 19, 10:47 am, Remi P <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Chris, > >> > >> Sorry to reply to this old post, but I'm facing a similar issue with > signed > >> RSLs. > >> > >> It seems that copy-flex-resources works fine when swz artefacts are > >> deployed in the repository but many versions don't contain the swz > >> artefacts. For example version 4.6.b.23201 (the last stable version form > >> Adobe) doesn't include swz artefacts. Did you have any workaround which > >> could allow us to provide our own swz artefacts to FM? Or much better: > do > >> you have write permissions to deploy artefacts in the flex sonatype repo > >> (but I don't know if it's an heavy task)? > >> > >> Regards > >> > >> Rémi > >> > >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Christofer Dutz < > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> [email protected]> wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > >> > In our case we never actually added an adobe rsl url. Even if we were > >> > using signed rsls. The copy-flex-resources nicely copies the swz files > >> > to the location I provided in the rslUrl. The Flashplayer has no > >> > problem with loading them from my server as it trusts them because of > >> > their signature. > >> > >> > You could say that loading them from Adobe could reduce traffic on > >> > your server in real life, but on the downside you would be dependent > >> > on Adobe hosting the swz files on the same url (Imagine the Java SDK > >> > depending on a Sun Url). Usually I trust my own server most :-) > >> > >> > If you want to load the rsls from Adobe I see no real way to optimize > >> > besides eventually changing the order of the rsls to check your server > >> > first and Adobes servers after that. If you now remove the Adobe rsls > >> > and swzs then the application would try to load them from your server > >> > first - this would fail - and then it would try Adobes server. When > >> > loading your application modules however your Server would immediately > >> > serve them. > >> > >> > I have to admit that I like the "load everything from your own server" > >> > approach a lot more than the other one. > >> > >> > Just to add my 50ct to the discussion. > >> > >> > Chris > >> > >> > 2012/4/10 [email protected] <[email protected]>: > >> > > Hi, I have more or less the same issue. > >> > >> > > Did you find any workaround ? > >> > >> > > Thanks, > >> > > BQ. > >> > >> > > On Monday, September 26, 2011 7:19:15 AM UTC+2, J_A_X wrote: > >> > >> > >> I'm wondering if it's possible to fix a smallish issue with the > >> > >> compilation process. I set my RSL url like this: > >> > >> > >> <rslUrls> > >> > >> > >> <url> > >> > > http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/{extension}/flex/${flex.sdk.version}/{artifactId}_{version}.{extension} > >> > </url> > >> > >> <url>rsls/{artifactId}-{version}.{extension}</url> > >> > >> </rslUrls> > >> > >> > >> The first is of course to get the flex framework cached RSLs, and > the > >> > >> second is for local RSLs. This of course works fine, but my > problem > >> > comes > >> > >> with the config.xml that gets created: > >> > >> > >> <runtime-shared-library-path> > >> > >> > > <path-element>C:\Users\mboudreau\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\framework\4.5.1.21328\framework-4.5.1.21328.swc</path-element> > >> > >> > >> <rsl-url> > >> >http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.21328/framework_4.5.1.. > .. > >> > </rsl-url> > >> > >> > >> <policy-file-url> > http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/crossdomain.xml > >> > </policy-file-url> > >> > >> <rsl-url>rsls/framework-4.5.1.21328.swz</rsl-url> > >> > >> </runtime-shared-library-path> > >> > >> > >> So it would look in both location for the RSL file, for all RSLs. > This > >> > >> isn't much an issue with the Flex RSL, but it does become one when > >> > trying to > >> > >> load my local RSLs since it always look at the adobe site first. > When > >> > I'm > >> > >> testing this in my browser, it seems that it takes a few seconds > longer > >> > to > >> > >> load my application when using this method because it needs to > wait for > >> > the > >> > >> request to come back before going to the next url. > >> > >> > >> I was hoping that there might be a way to fix this to have only one > >> > >> specific url per RSL so that it doesn't have to go through each > rslUrl. > >> > >> > > -- > >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > > [email protected] > >> > > For more options, visit this group at > >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > >> > >> > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > >> > >> > -- > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> > [email protected] > >> > For more options, visit this group at > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > >> > >> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > [email protected] > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
