Ah ok ... well I guess in that case you will have to deploy them yourself. I will not deploy these in the public repo as I am currently working on an entirely new deployment of all FDKs with matching Flexmojos Version 6.x ...
Chris 2012/9/20 Remi P <[email protected]>: > @velo: not yet... but I will try if I have no other workaround > > @chris: yes of course swz files are part of the official adobe sdk, but what > I said is that these swz artefacts are not deployed on the sonatype > repository. > > regards > > Remi > > > On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:55 PM, Christofer Dutz <[email protected]> > wrote: >> >> Why do you claim, that 4.6.0.23201B doesn't contain any SWZs? If I >> have a look at the FDK they are all there. >> We will be having serious trouble with the Apache FDKs as these will >> no longer contain SWZ files but all official Apache FDKs should >> contain them. >> >> Chris >> >> >> >> 2012/9/19 Marvin Froeder <[email protected]>: >> > Did you tried installind it manually? >> > >> > On Sep 19, 10:47 am, Remi P <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Chris, >> >> >> >> Sorry to reply to this old post, but I'm facing a similar issue with >> >> signed >> >> RSLs. >> >> >> >> It seems that copy-flex-resources works fine when swz artefacts are >> >> deployed in the repository but many versions don't contain the swz >> >> artefacts. For example version 4.6.b.23201 (the last stable version >> >> form >> >> Adobe) doesn't include swz artefacts. Did you have any workaround which >> >> could allow us to provide our own swz artefacts to FM? Or much better: >> >> do >> >> you have write permissions to deploy artefacts in the flex sonatype >> >> repo >> >> (but I don't know if it's an heavy task)? >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> Rémi >> >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Christofer Dutz < >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> >> >> > In our case we never actually added an adobe rsl url. Even if we were >> >> > using signed rsls. The copy-flex-resources nicely copies the swz >> >> > files >> >> > to the location I provided in the rslUrl. The Flashplayer has no >> >> > problem with loading them from my server as it trusts them because of >> >> > their signature. >> >> >> >> > You could say that loading them from Adobe could reduce traffic on >> >> > your server in real life, but on the downside you would be dependent >> >> > on Adobe hosting the swz files on the same url (Imagine the Java SDK >> >> > depending on a Sun Url). Usually I trust my own server most :-) >> >> >> >> > If you want to load the rsls from Adobe I see no real way to optimize >> >> > besides eventually changing the order of the rsls to check your >> >> > server >> >> > first and Adobes servers after that. If you now remove the Adobe rsls >> >> > and swzs then the application would try to load them from your server >> >> > first - this would fail - and then it would try Adobes server. When >> >> > loading your application modules however your Server would >> >> > immediately >> >> > serve them. >> >> >> >> > I have to admit that I like the "load everything from your own >> >> > server" >> >> > approach a lot more than the other one. >> >> >> >> > Just to add my 50ct to the discussion. >> >> >> >> > Chris >> >> >> >> > 2012/4/10 [email protected] <[email protected]>: >> >> > > Hi, I have more or less the same issue. >> >> >> >> > > Did you find any workaround ? >> >> >> >> > > Thanks, >> >> > > BQ. >> >> >> >> > > On Monday, September 26, 2011 7:19:15 AM UTC+2, J_A_X wrote: >> >> >> >> > >> I'm wondering if it's possible to fix a smallish issue with the >> >> > >> compilation process. I set my RSL url like this: >> >> >> >> > >> <rslUrls> >> >> >> >> > >> <url> >> >> >> >> > >http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/{extension}/flex/${flex.sdk.version}/{artifactId}_{version}.{extension} >> >> > </url> >> >> > >> <url>rsls/{artifactId}-{version}.{extension}</url> >> >> > >> </rslUrls> >> >> >> >> > >> The first is of course to get the flex framework cached RSLs, and >> >> > >> the >> >> > >> second is for local RSLs. This of course works fine, but my >> >> > >> problem >> >> > comes >> >> > >> with the config.xml that gets created: >> >> >> >> > >> <runtime-shared-library-path> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > <path-element>C:\Users\mboudreau\.m2\repository\com\adobe\flex\framework\framework\4.5.1.21328\framework-4.5.1.21328.swc</path-element> >> >> >> >> > >> <rsl-url> >> >> >> >> > >http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/flex/4.5.1.21328/framework_4.5.1.... >> >> > </rsl-url> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> <policy-file-url>http://fpdownload.adobe.com/pub/swz/crossdomain.xml >> >> > </policy-file-url> >> >> > >> <rsl-url>rsls/framework-4.5.1.21328.swz</rsl-url> >> >> > >> </runtime-shared-library-path> >> >> >> >> > >> So it would look in both location for the RSL file, for all RSLs. >> >> > >> This >> >> > >> isn't much an issue with the Flex RSL, but it does become one when >> >> > trying to >> >> > >> load my local RSLs since it always look at the adobe site first. >> >> > >> When >> >> > I'm >> >> > >> testing this in my browser, it seems that it takes a few seconds >> >> > >> longer >> >> > to >> >> > >> load my application when using this method because it needs to >> >> > >> wait for >> >> > the >> >> > >> request to come back before going to the next url. >> >> >> >> > >> I was hoping that there might be a way to fix this to have only >> >> > >> one >> >> > >> specific url per RSL so that it doesn't have to go through each >> >> > >> rslUrl. >> >> >> >> > > -- >> >> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> >> > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> >> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > > [email protected] >> >> > > For more options, visit this group at >> >> > >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> >> >> > >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> >> >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> >> > [email protected] >> >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >> >http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> >> >> >http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected] >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> > >> > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Flex Mojos" group. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> [email protected] >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos >> >> http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Flex Mojos" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos > > http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Flex Mojos" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/flex-mojos http://flexmojos.sonatype.org/
