This is probably the case, since the Adobe team couldn't reproduce the problem according to the JIRA bug report. Since it's the memory required just to start builder and support the design view, they must have chosen just on the border of "good."
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Raymond Camden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't memory usage something that is impossible to predict amongst > disparate machines, operating systems, etc? I'm sure the Eclipse team > probably used settings that were 'most' good for the widest ranges of > setups. Just like CF's initial settings normally need some tweakings > as well. -- mxAjax / CFAjax docs and other useful articles: http://www.bifrost.com.au/blog/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Adobe® ColdFusion® 8 software 8 is the most important and dramatic release to date Get the Free Trial http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;160198600;22374440;w Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/Flex/message.cfm/messageid:5101 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/Flex/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.37
