[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 03:50:00 2004 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Apparently-To: [email protected] Received: (qmail 16621 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2004 10:49:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.172) by m10.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Apr 2004 10:49:58 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO web40808.mail.yahoo.com) (66.218.78.185) by mta4.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2004 10:49:58 -0000 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from [81.189.82.25] by web40808.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 06:49:56 EDT Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 06:49:56 -0400 (EDT) To: [email protected] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 66.218.78.185 From: Gerald Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Blog Story: Laszlo XUL vs. Macromedia XUL (Flex/MXML) X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=119952859 X-Yahoo-Profile: luxorxul
Hello, Allow me to highlight the blog story titled "Laszlo is XML technology, not Flash technology" by David Temkin that explains how the Laszlo XUL server toolkit differs from Macromedia's XUL server offering (aka Flex/MXML). David is the CTO of Laszlo Systems so don't expect a fair and balanced story. Full story @ http://www.davidtemkin.com/mtarchive/000001.html What's your take on it? Do server-side XUL toolkits have a future? - Gerald ------------------- Gerald Bauer Open XUL Alliance - A Rich Internet For Everyone | http://xul.sourceforge.net XUL News Wire | http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.xul.announce ______________________________________________________________________ Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
