[EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 10:14:48 2004 Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Apparently-To: [email protected] Received: (qmail 37487 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2004 17:14:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (66.218.66.216) by m15.grp.scd.yahoo.com with QMQP; 5 Apr 2004 17:14:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO p01mgw01.macromedia.com) (216.104.212.90) by mta1.grp.scd.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2004 17:14:47 -0000 Received: from S1001EXM02.macromedia.com ([10.4.48.132]) by p01mgw01.macromedia.com (Switch-3.1.4/Switch-3.1.0) with ESMTP id i35HEiSn009782 for <[email protected]>; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 10:14:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by S1001EXM02.macromedia.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <G3CSTP3V>; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:14:44 -0400 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:14:43 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) Content-Type: text/plain X-eGroups-Remote-IP: 216.104.212.90 From: David Mendels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: [flexcoders] Future Speed Improvements for Flash Player? X-Yahoo-Group-Post: member; u=1930368
Hello, A) A performance optimization whitepaper for Flex is in editing stages and should be up on our site pretty soon (I don't know the exact date or I would be more specific.) B) Yes, performance improvement is the major focus of the next rev of the Flash Player. -David > -----Original Message----- > From: pk_wasp [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, April 03, 2004 8:13 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [flexcoders] Future Speed Improvements for Flash Player? > > Hi > > I'm a J2EE Developer (please don't boo me :) ) looking into > RIA (for Intranet Apps anyway). I'm still waiting for the > Trial Flex CD to arrive (can't wait) but 1 think i've notice > is that the Flash Movies/Sites/Apps are noticably slower and > less responsive then Java HTML Form Apps/Windows Apps etc > even slower then Java Swing Apps. > > Are there any plans/rumours with for the next Flash Player to > have a performance increase like last time?. I know desktop > machines are getting faster but the majority of our clients > are still stuck on machines with less then 500Mhz CPUs. > > Coz FLex supports liquid layout, lots of new controls etc the > only thing stopping me from recommending management to take a > serious look @ Flash is the speed e.g Flex Store demo didn't > run too well on 600MHz machines. > > It'll be good to read up on articles on how to optimise > Flex/Flash for lower end client machines, does any1 know of any? > > cheers. > > > > > > > > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > >
