Could you expand on/list these "unpleasant limitations"? I'm one of these small companies trying to decide whether Flex is "worth it".
Thanks, Jim -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Laudrup Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:09 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Questions, Questions Flex server is only a presentation layer that runs on top of your current J2EE/.NET app. There is no diff between a flex app and any other J2EE app in the way the app is deployed... Per my understanding when develop a j2ee app that uses Flex as presentation layer, then you'll have to pay for Flex license in order to deploy the app... and the price might vary.... it was 12k/2cpu a while back but know is more expensive.... the good news is that MM is willing to negotiate with you and probably you'll get something that will work out well for you. For short I'm afraid that you cannot run a flex app without paying a runtime license fee... nice huh... way to go JSF... In my opinion the cost of the license might be a show stopper for many small companies that want to develop/deploy flex applications. In addition to the license cost you need to consider some unpleasant limitations this product has and see if for the money you pay you get what you need....which probably you already did. So, welcome to the dark side... Michael __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Yahoo! Groups Links Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
