I don't recommend writing complicated binding expressions, because you
have to use &lt; in place of <, &gt; in place of >, and &amp; in place
of &.

 

Gordon Smith

Adobe Flex SDK Team

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sid Maskit
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2008 2:54 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] NaN and Infinity showing in output - How to
modify?

 

"Eww," eh? Well, gee, Tom, I hope I didn't spoil your breakfast or
anything ;)

I think both your refactorings are good ones. I was definitely in "how
do we get this working" mode, not "how do we get this as elegantly
written as possible" mode: i.e. I was in code-writing not refactoring
mode. So I suppose I shouldn't complain about you pointing out a bad
smell coming from the code writing.

Having said that, I have to admit that I am not at all clear as to
protocol for how much ActionScript is acceptable within braces while
assigning to an MXML attribute, or whether there are accepted standards
for this. I have the fear that this might be a religious question, but
maybe not. If there are accepted protocols, I'd love to hear what they
are.

Just to help clarify things, I'm wondering whether you have any
objection to ternary statements, or if you do just feel that this is too
much code to have within an attribute assignment. For example, would
this satisfy your objection:

<mx:Script>
    <![CDATA[
        private function formatLabel():String {
            private var result:String;
            result = (isNaN(myNumber as Number)) ? 0 :
PrepForDisplay.format(myNumber);
            return result;
        }
    ]]>
</mx:Script>

<mx:Label id="display" text="{formatLabel()}" />

 

Sid Maskit
Partner 
CraftySpace
Better Websites for a Better World
http://www.CraftySpace.com
blog: http://smaskit.blogspot.com/





 

----- Original Message ----
From: Tom Chiverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Friday, August 1, 2008 5:04:56 AM
Subject: Re: [flexcoders] NaN and Infinity showing in output - How to
modify?

On Thursday 31 Jul 2008, Sid Maskit wrote:
> <mx:Label id="display" text="{(isNaN(myNumber as Number)) ? 0 :
> PrepForDisplay.format(myNumber)}" 

Eww.
That is so hard to read.
Either use a labelFunction or just fix PrepForDisplay.format().


-- 
Tom Chiverton

****************************************************

This email is sent for and on behalf of Halliwells LLP.

Halliwells LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
and Wales under registere! d number OC307980 whose registered office
address is at Halliwells LLP, 3 Hardman Square, Spinningfields,
Manchester, M3 3EB.  A list of members is available for inspection at
the registered office. Any reference to a partner in relation to
Halliwells LLP means a member of Halliwells LLP.  Regulated by The
Solicitors Regulation Authority.

CONFIDENTIALITY

This email is intended only for the use of the addressee named above and
may be confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the addressee
you must not read it and must not use any information contained in nor
copy it nor inform any person other than Halliwells LLP or the addressee
of its existence or contents.  If you have received this email in error
please delete it and notify Halliwells LLP IT Department on 0870 365
2500.

For more information about Halliwells LLP visit www.halliwells.com.

------------------------------------

--
Flexcoders Mailing List
FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt
<http://gr!%0d%0a%20oups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.
txt> 
Search Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo
<http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo> ! Groups
Links


    (Yahoo! ID required)

    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 



 

 

Reply via email to