I see your problem I think. Are you setting component.datasource = resultEvent.result through actionscript somewhere? That won't get updated when you make another service call, because a new result object is created. If you bind to service.lastResult (or something, I don't do it that way) instead, it should work. Once you set something manually without using bindings, you can't get updates if that whole object is replaced.
-Josh On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 1:14 AM, rss181919 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I get the same result. As long as I copy the event.result properties > over to my custom property, I get binding, but trying to set it to > the object causes binding to fail even though the object properties > transfer over to the custom property successfully. > > I set my webservice to makeObjectsBindable but this does not seem to > help. I also declare my storage object as bindable. I read the > recommendation about the IEventDispather but if the object and the > properties have already been tagged as bindable and setting the > properties directly causes binding, i dont think implementing > IEventDispatcher will be a difference. > > Any other thoughts on this? I could write a script to copy the > properties over but i believe flex should do this and i would rather > let flex handle it if it can. > > > --- In [email protected], Nik Derewianka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have run into the same issue. My RemoteObject calls are already > set > > to makeObjectsBindable so that doesn't seem to be the issue. > > Basically, if i have a view that is already displaying the bound > > object, then do a remoteobject call that replaces the existing > bound > > object with a new one, the bindings do not update. Which makes > sense > > as the replacement instance would not have the bindings of the > current > > model object set on it. Instead, I have resorted to copying the > props > > over to the existing model object so that the bindings and > references > > stay intact, using this script: > > > > > > public class ObjUtil > > { > > import flash.utils.*; > > public function ObjUtil() > > { > > } > > > > public static function CopyProps > (source:*,destination:*):void{ > > var def:XML = describeType(source); > > var properties:XMLList = [EMAIL PROTECTED] > + [EMAIL PROTECTED]; > > for each (var property:String in properties ) > { > > destination[property] = source > [property]; > > } > > } > > > > } > > > > And is used like this: > > > > ObjUtil.CopyProps(e.result,userModel.currentUser); > > > > It is not immensely robust and still feels like i am missing > something > > in regards to binding - but this works without a whole bunch of > extra > > typing for each and every property that needs to be updated. > > > > Regards, > > Nik > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > -- > Flexcoders Mailing List > FAQ: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/flexcoders/files/flexcodersFAQ.txt > Search Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/flexcoders%40yahoogroups.comYahoo! Groups > Links > > > > -- "Therefore, send not to know For whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee." :: Josh 'G-Funk' McDonald :: 0437 221 380 :: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
