Hi Doug,
No, they are not graphical...static int data...here is a good wiki
for what we are doing....the columns in my ADG are the DYS markers and
the data for each row comes from the alleles (which in the wiki table
are the valid range, e.g. DYS390 has an allelic value between 17 and 28).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_DYS_markers
I am not using any graphics at all in the table. It is literally
all plain ol' data. All of the numbers are stored in the DB and I am
simply taking the data from the table in the db and displaying in a
table on my presentation layer.
Adrian
Douglas Knudsen wrote:
These markers are graphic?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_fragment_length_polymorphism
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Restriction_fragment_length_polymorphism>
If so, couldn't you use the drawing API maybe in a ItemRenderer for a
List? Much lighter than a DG and certainly far lighter then ADG.
DK
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 12:21 PM, Adrian Williams
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
Hi Tom,
Under normal circumstances, I would tend to agree...however,
it's our users that are demanding the data...in a nutshell, we are
displaying genetic DNA data and the columns are pertinent to the
work our users are doing. The 100 columns are genetic markers and
the row is a test sample with the information for each genetic
marker.
Adrian
Tom Chiverton wrote:
On Thursday 04 Sep 2008, Adrian Williams wrote:
My ADG has approx. 100 columns with approx. 200 rows,
I wouldn't consider a 100 row DataGrid a very good user experience, in the
general case, so maybe you could redo the GUI.
Probably not the quickest fix :-)
--
Douglas Knudsen
http://www.cubicleman.com <http://www.cubicleman.com>
this is my signature, like it?
