Agreed. And it could be argued that by designing the server interaction
properly you can impose less load on the server than a typical HTML app. The
initial download of the SWF may be larger, but you don't have all those page
refreshes. Plus you have the option of efficient binary communication with
AMF.

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 8:45 AM, Paul Andrews <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>    Wouldn't it really depend on the backend technology used, not just
> Flex?
>
> Flex is predomiately a client side technology with various options for
> interacting with a back-end server, so applications using large numbers of
> clients will be dependent more on the server setup, not so much the client.
>
> That said, it'll be interesting to see what replies you get.
>
> Paul
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* R H. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 07, 2008 7:37 AM
> *Subject:* [flexcoders] Is there a live example which shows Flex can
> handle thousands of concurrent users?
>
> Hello Folks,
>
> Would there be anyone who can point me to some live cases where they show
> Flex can handle thousands of concurrent users, such as on trading floors?
>
> Thanks
> Ryan
>
>  
>

Reply via email to