Just one more word of caution. The timer MUST allow enough time for the server to complete the request that you have asked of it. The last thing that you want is to stack up requests to the server. Ideally in this timer environment you won't make a request to the server while the last request hasn't yet completed.
Bit harder than at first sight, isn't it? Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: Paul Andrews To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:39 PM Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: How to keep Tree control synchronized with the database. Please Help A word of caution Anuj. I don't know if your timer works once a second or once a minute, or once every two minutes. If you have only one online user, it's not too huge a deal either way. If you have a hundred users you can cause big problems for your server. The timer technique just makes the best of a bad job. Usually a lot of care is taken over database and query design to minimise the impact of large numbers of users. Unfortunately the timer technique gives the server a lot of work even when the number of users is quite small. Remember a timer on the client just affects one user and there's usually processor power to spare. A timer in conjunction with a server database access stresses the server. It stresses the server a lot. End of cautionary note. Paul ----- Original Message ----- From: anuj sharma To: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2008 11:31 PM Subject: Re: [flexcoders] Re: How to keep Tree control synchronized with the database. Please Help Bingo Guys Thats' exactly what i need. Tracy's Timer example works perfect for me. Again thanks a lot for your help. Anuj On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 2:29 PM, john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Anuj I meant, "search through the online adobe docs for 'timer polling example' or other keywords like those." there are many many examples in the online docs at Adobe. John anuj sharma wrote: > Hi John > I am not sure i get what you are trying to say. Can you be please elaborate > little bit more. > Thanks > Anuj > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:13 AM, john fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> @mark: thanks will check it out >> @anuj: >> this is just exactly what the adobe sample code does, except not >> directly to the database. >> >> anuj sharma wrote: >> >>> ... Can I use the Timer class to create a timer instance >>> >>> which will periodically call HTTP a >>> >> >> >> > >
