If this is covered under the SDK licence, then distributing the framework gives Adobe the right to audit us. If that's the case, we may have to stop using Flex altogether.
--- In [email protected], Matt Chotin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm not not sure why you say the SDK license doesn't apply. It does apply (unless you mean because we've indicated the piece falls under the MPL). But it is expected that you may distribute the framework_3.0.0.477.swf as an RSL as part of your program. > > Matt > Adobe, Flex Product Manager > Consider yourself legally approved for that file > > > On 11/14/08 8:28 AM, "whatabrain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I'm using dynamic linking, and distributing framework_3.0.0.477.swf > with my web control. My company has been desperately searching around > for a licence for this file, but can't find one. In fact, they can't > even find a licence for the statically-linked version. I know it sounds > silly, but some companies require these things. That's why Visual > Studio comes with a licence that says "anything you compile is owned by > you." > > We've looked at the SDK licence, which doesn't seem to apply. It puts > incredibly harsh restrictions and liability on you if you distribute > any component of the SDK (for example, Adobe can audit your software at > any time), but framework_3.0.0.477.swf is not included in the SDK. > > When we called Adobe, we effectively got the answer: "That's a stupid > question. Of course you can distribute programs that you write," but > for a company worried about this kind of thing, that's not a useful > answer. > > So can anyone help me out? Is there a licence somewhere for this kind > of thing? >
